Traditional Labor Law for Employers
J Barrow Legal counsels Ohio employers through organizing campaigns, NLRB elections and first-contract bargaining, as well as the ongoing administration of a union relationship, including grievances.
Organizing often begins quietly, with a few conversations, a group chat or a stack of signed union cards. By the time leadership learns of it, NLRB deadlines may already be running. Under the current election rules, a pre-election hearing is ordinarily scheduled about eight days after the Notice of Hearing is served, so decisions about the bargaining unit, supervisory status and messaging must be made within days.
Employers have a protected right to share their views. But one statement by a supervisor that is viewed as a threat, promise or interrogation can result in an unfair labor practice charge, a rerun election or, in some cases, an order to bargain without a new vote. Good outcomes usually come from preparation, disciplined communication and a clean record.
We assess the petitioned-for unit, supervisory and voter-eligibility questions and the Statement of Position deadline, then build a lawful communication calendar for leadership.
We provide practical training for front-line leaders on TIPS (threats, interrogation, promises, surveillance) and FOE (facts, opinions, examples), built around scenarios from the client's workplace and paired with a clear process for escalating questions.
We respond to NLRB charges and regional investigations, preserve the record and evaluate settlement options in light of the company's broader labor relations objectives.
We prepare proposals and costing, advise the bargaining team or sit at the table with it, and, once a contract is in place, handle grievances and arbitration.
We review workplace rules, supervisor practices, employee relations and emerging labor risks, either through discrete engagements or as part of ongoing labor and employment counsel. Fractional general counsel services are available separately for organizations that need broader legal and strategic oversight.
Jazmyn Barrow has served as lead negotiator or management counsel in more than 75 collective bargaining agreements, representing private- and public-sector employers in negotiations and ongoing labor relations. Her experience includes first-contract negotiations involving bargaining units of approximately 2,000 employees and an organizing campaign and representation election involving a university staff unit of approximately 6,000 employees.
Her practice spans manufacturing, services, the performing arts, public safety and higher education, including labor arbitration and proceedings before the NLRB and Ohio's State Employment Relations Board. As an Assistant Ohio Attorney General, she also served as statutory counsel to SERB. That breadth informs her approach to bargaining, with attention not only to the agreement reached but also to the operational obligations the employer will administer long after negotiations conclude.
Jurisdiction shapes the employer's first response. Most private-sector employers are governed by the National Labor Relations Act, while Ohio public employers generally operate under R.C. Chapter 4117 and the procedures of the State Employment Relations Board. Identifying the correct statutory framework determines the recognition process, procedural obligations and available options.
Protected activity often precedes a formal campaign. Discussions among employees about compensation, scheduling, safety and other working conditions may be protected before a union petition is filed. Management's response to those early conversations can affect the legal position the employer occupies if organizing activity advances.
Recognition demands and election petitions compress decision time. Bargaining-unit composition, supervisory status, election procedures and communications strategy require prompt assessment. A coordinated response should establish the employer's legal options and procedural deadlines before management takes positions that may be difficult to revisit.
Supervisor communications require discipline. Employers may communicate their views concerning representation, but threats, coercive questioning, promises of benefits and unlawful surveillance create unfair labor practice exposure. Effective preparation gives supervisors a clear understanding of what they may communicate and when matters should be referred to labor counsel.
The strategy must account for what follows the election. Union representation affects how employers address wages, benefits, work rules and other terms and conditions of employment. Preparation should therefore extend beyond the immediate campaign to the bargaining obligations and management decisions the employer may face afterward.
Not under the NLRB's current Amazon.com Services precedent. Employers may hold meetings to communicate their views on union representation, but attendance must be voluntary. The Board's framework calls for reasonable advance notice of the meeting's subject, confirmation that employees may decline without adverse consequences, and assurance that attendance records will not be maintained. The precedent is under challenge, so employers should verify the governing law before planning campaign communications.
Supervisors should not threaten consequences, question employees about their union views, promise benefits, or watch or appear to watch union activity. They may share facts, opinions and examples, such as how union dues work or the company's perspective on representation. Training supervisors before a campaign begins reduces the risk that a single conversation becomes an unfair labor practice charge.
A recognition demand requires prompt attention, but management should assess its legal options before responding. Counsel should first identify the governing labor statute, the proposed bargaining unit, the union's claimed majority support and any available election procedures. Under existing Board precedent, prompt filing of an employer election petition may affect potential unfair labor practice exposure, although the Board has clarified that its two-week Cemex filing concept is not a jurisdictional deadline. The Sixth Circuit has also rejected the Cemex bargaining-order standard, making a current, jurisdiction-specific assessment especially important for Ohio employers.
Representation proceedings can move quickly, with important obligations arising before an election date is set. Under current procedures, employers generally must post the Notice of Petition for Election within two business days after service of the Notice of Hearing, and a pre-election hearing is ordinarily scheduled approximately eight days after service. Statements of Position and voter lists are subject to separate, short deadlines. The actual election date depends on the case and is scheduled for the earliest practicable date under the applicable rules.
Yes, through a decertification petition, subject to timing limits. Employees may file a petition with at least 30 percent support, but generally not within one year after certification and, while a contract is in effect, only during the window 90 to 60 days before it expires (or after its third year). The employer may not initiate or assist the effort, although it may lawfully answer employee questions.
Current as of October 2026.
Share a few details about your situation, and we’ll follow up to discuss fit, timing, and next steps.